• Gregory Ball posted an update 7 months, 3 weeks ago

    fast file site

    When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud should be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

    Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

    When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

    Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. p2p 추천 However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

    File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).


    It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

    In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

    When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.

    You will need to share a URL so you can’t share music files or videos.

    According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It’s even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It’s much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

    It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let’s assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it’s often take off at that point)

    It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

    You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

    Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you’re in a place where the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it’s in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

    The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

    Google Drive

    It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

    It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

    It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

    Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn’t bother me.

    There are the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It’s a tiny problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it’s the best in the desktop environment.

    Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

    There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There’s a testimony that it’s a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn’t stipulated by company policy.

    If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it’s the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)


    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

    There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.

    The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn’t bother with Google Drive.

    The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

    The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It’s practically infinite unless you’re going to share large files.

    The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

    Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards…

    You will find a saying that changes in documents can’t be reflected in real time when working on documents.

    Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.

    The dropbox itself can’t be documented.

    There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

    In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

    File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

    Slow. Not paid people.

    Media access is very disadvantageous. It’s a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

    The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

    Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it’s much better than Dropbox, but it’s significantly less than Google Drive).

    It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***


    The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

    The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn’t that strong a difference.

    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.